Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gil Lavi (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:36, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Gil_Lavi
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CREATIVE, this fact has not changed since the last deletion even though the page was republished. Brianvan (talk) 05:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt He's a commercial photographer; there does not seem to be more to the story than that. When I search all I can find are lousy sources, and there aren't that many overall. The available sourcing is quite weak. I removed four non-RS sources from the article, ranging from Youtube to personal blogs to an item he himself had published.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:20, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:21, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:21, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:21, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Pinging Libby norman, who may well have retired but who turned this into an article (and did a lot of other work on it). -- Hoary (talk) 11:44, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~   {talk}  00:29, 3 March 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  07:30, 10 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.