Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gil Rabbi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. If an established user thinks it worth bringing back to AfD, the usual waiting period need not apply, but with split consensus I don't see a relist helping at this time. Star  Mississippi  18:39, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Gil Rabbi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable Entrepreneur. Tone is very advertising. --- Misterrrrr (talk) 13:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC) - WP:SOCKSTRIKE - Beccaynr (talk) 18:43, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Israel. Misterrrrr (talk) 13:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete, has written an article about himself in Forbes, that's about the best sourcing I find. Non-RS as it's primary. Oaktree b (talk) 15:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep good Hebrew sourcing in my POV, and kind of notable Israel-based person, however Forbes council blog should be deleted. Mozzcircuit (talk) 11:41, 11 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. Per much better sourcing at Hewiki and WP:NEXIST. gidonb (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 16:59, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've just removed Forbes blog - it was really not reliable source (100%). I think, the general notability of the person is established through the development of Israel hi-tech industry. I chose to translate the page as it is quite old and well sourced in a sophisticated Hebrew Wikipedia. BTW, I didn't include awards like top 100 Entrepreneurs of Israel.. and so on. NiLok223 (talk) 18:05, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. The coverage does not seem in depth. - GizzyCatBella  🍁  07:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. For the reasons stated in the nomination. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak draftify because the article has potential even if it is not suitable for mainspace right now. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 07:59, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Because the keep votes focused on Hebrew sources, I only checked those. They are mostly brief mentions of him in the context of his business dealings, none of it is significant. There was also one interview (not independent). His company might be notable, but he is not. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 20:18, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment, weak keep. The page was nominated by a sock. Not a good sign for the discussion. The person's notablity is on the edge, but counting the sock's nomination—Weak Keep 77.137.71.121 (talk) 11:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.