Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilda Joelle Osborn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:10, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Gilda Joelle Osborn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sources are fake. News Distinct http://www.newsdistinct.com/contact/ Coverage Log http://www.coveragelog.com/contact/, Curious Desk http://www.curiousdesk.com/contact/ (who forgot to fix a copy/paste error from the Daily Beast), are all operated from the same address. naludamagazine.com has no byline and no contact information at all. Vexations (talk) 21:43, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:44, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:44, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)


 * There are 20 sources total in this wikipedia page- you are claiming 3 are fake. You then mention Naluda Magazine has no contact information when they provide a contact page, contact form, contact address and email. Sources included in the article including Maxim, Next Model Management, Gilda Joelle Official Webpage, Healthy Celeb, Artvoice & Busted Coverage are also not fake news outlets. Ciaragomez1 (talk) 05:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , Actually, there are only twelve unique sources, including the ones I have already identified as fake, plus the subject's own website and that of her management, both of which are not independent, and then there is https://www.maxim.com/tag/gilda-joelle which isn't really an article at all. I'll go though the other ones in a bit. Vexations (talk) 15:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The Maxim Article cited & sourced is this one: https://www.maxim.com/women/what-gilda-joelle-wants-2019-12 which is a 13 question interview with Gilda Joelle Osborn. It is independent and it is an article. Ciaragomez1 (talk) 18:00, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * It's an interview, not an independent, reliable secondary source. See:WP:PRIMARYVexations (talk) 18:54, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Incorrect. Naluda Magazine Contact information listed here: https://www.naludamagazine.com/contact/ Naluda Magazine 4590 MacArthur Blvd, Suite 670, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Listed on the contact page of their site. Contact page also lists an email. Ciaragomez1 (talk) 05:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Ciaragomez1 (talk) 05:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * as I explained at Articles for deletion/Jessica Markowski It's a little odd that that contact page isn't actually linked from the main page. I did do a search and check the source code. I even tried https://www.naludamagazine.com/contact-us/, but that didn't have any info on it. So yes, I wrongly assumed that they didn't have one. I'm surprised you found it. I also think it's weird that several other companies all have the same address: for example. I think that they're all connected to . Vexations (talk) 16:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Discounting the fake sources already listed, there does not seem to be any other sources which would help with notability. TheAwesome  Hwyh  23:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * delete discounting the fake and unreliable sources would leave this with a grand total of 0 sources. I can find nothing better. Praxidicae (talk) 20:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Voicing can’t seem to find any true RS that substantiates any notability claims made.Celestina007 (talk) 20:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - another page about a model with terrible sourcing. My partner and I watch all the pageants and modelling vlogs, but you can't take this one seriously as notable. I would have excused this in 2007 but not now; we are a charity, not a free web-host.Bearian (talk) 19:05, 24 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.