Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilgamesh II


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jim Starlin. Consensus is to redirect (non-admin closure) Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Gilgamesh II

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I found no significant coverage for this four issue comic series. SL93 (talk) 22:15, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:05, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment - Surprisingly, I actually did find one pretty decent source here, in a book discussing the Ancient Near East's influence on modern pop culture. This comic gets a fairly good chunk of discussion in the chapter on Gilgamesh.  There is also this article from Back Issue! about Jim Starlin that mentions it, as well, though the actual coverage on Gilgamesh II is very minimal, and basically just boils down to "this is a thing he did during this time".  With one good source and one not-so-good source, I'm not quite ready to commit to recommending a Keep, but I do believe that straight deletion is inappropriate - at the very least, it should be Redirected to Jim Starlin.  Rorshacma (talk) 00:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:29, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Jim_Starlin. I could find not sources beyond those already mentioned by  and I don't consider them significant coverage.  The scholarly one is a one-paragraph plot summary that is only a passing example of the authors's point that the Gilgamesh epic resonates and was adapted to tell new stories in the 20th century.  It is not really that significant in context.  The Back Issue! source is even less impressive.  No evidence that this was a significant work aside from "it was something a famous comic writer did." [[User:Eggishorn|Eggishorn ]] (talk) (contrib) 19:29, 13 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.