Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gillian Bonner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Stifle (talk) 10:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Gillian Bonner

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Barely notable stub BLP. She was in a non-notable video game from a non-notable publisher, and was alleged to be in an Everlast song, but Everlast's article makes no mention of it. Since the PORNBIO criteria "has been a Playboy Playmate" was voided, I believe that the article does not meet our inclusion criteria. The Wordsmith Communicate 17:25, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: I realize this is part of a good faith mass nomination started by Off2riorob and now apparently expanded by The Wordsmith, so I am posting basically the same comment on all of them.  I understand that WP:PORNBIO was changed recently via Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)/Archive_2010 but I don't think that outcome necessarily reflected true consensus.  The bright line rule of "every playmate gets an article" was much easier to administer and reduced editor overhead time, instead of us spending lots of time deciding that some (most?) playmates get articles and a few get shuffled off into some "playmates of 200x" article.  I guess we'll see, if these articles get deleted, whether they get successively recreated. (see also AfDs of other playmates now pending).  I went back to see what the actual track record is here, and I don't see an AfD for a playmate that resulted in a delete since the summer of 2004 (and there's only one!)  I guess WP:PORNBIO eventually was edited to say that playmates are considered notable to reflect what the AfDs were showing and thus avoid pointless debates. The fact that WP:PORNBIO was recently amended doesn't change the past precedent.  See:
 * Votes for deletion/Stephanie Heinrich (Aug 04 - appears it was a delete, article was recreated in July 05 and not been challenged since)
 * Votes for deletion/Audra Lynn (Oct. 04 keep)
 * Votes for deletion/Dalene Kurtis (Dec. 04 keep)
 * Articles for deletion/Carmella DeCesare (Feb 05 keep)
 * Articles for deletion/Alison Waite (April 06 keep)
 * Articles_for_deletion/Liz_Stewart (March 07 keep)
 * Articles for deletion/Marliece Andrada (Sept 07 keep) (Closer comment: "Absent stronger evidence, there is a longstanding consensus that all Playboy centerfolds are notable, given the fame of the publication both within and without its genre.")
 * Articles for deletion/Kimberly Evenson (May 08 keep)
 * Articles_for_deletion/Charlotte Kemp (Jan 10 keep)
 * Articles for deletion/Kelly Carrington (Feb 10 keep)
 * Articles for deletion/Janet Pilgrim (model) (March 10 keep)
 * Articles for deletion/Margie Harrison (March 10 keep)
 * Articles for deletion/Colleen Farrington (March 10 keep)
 * --Milowent (talk) 21:41, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - Google News search reveals coverage by multiple reliable sources satisfying the GNG for me. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:15, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - per WP:PORNSTAR and WP:DEFINITE HOTTIE. IMDb shows an acting and directing credit. --Morenooso (talk) 22:40, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per coverage found on Google News. Epbr123 (talk) 07:02, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Epbr, and Morbid. Dismas |(talk) 14:06, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Morbidthoughts. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. General news coverage satisfying the GNG. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:33, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep   in accord with the longstanding consensus that this is a significant award.  DGG ( talk ) 07:40, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.