Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gills Creek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep as the nomination has been withdrawn and all !vote are for 'keep', per WP:Speedy keep. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:14, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Gills Creek

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable geographical feature (it is "only" a stream). WP:GEOLAND is ambivalent on the matter. Note that there are numerous place called "Gills Creek" but they may all be equally non-notable. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 00:03, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The article has now been expanded a bit but I still stand by my AfD. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 01:43, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Expanded content 5 times with sources. Article now seems to pass the WP:GEOLAND provision that "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist". Keep vote does not take position on possible merges in the future AbstractIllusions (talk) 04:03, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Gosh! Good work! It is a shame that it will catch all searches for "Gills Creek". Almost need to link to Wikimapia or Wikimaps. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:20, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Most of the sourcing is tangential and doesn't particularly contribute toward notability, but the existence of multiple governmental sources dedicated to this stream demonstrates that it should be covered in a general encyclopedia.  Nyttend (talk) 04:14, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Withdraw as nominator. Article is now substantially changed. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:20, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.