Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilmore Community School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 08:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Gilmore Community School

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable elementary school, and the 'article' is nothing more than a business card, Note also the infobox whose elementary school listings are nearly all redlinks from AfD/speedy deletions. No evidence of any notability Travellingcari (talk) 20:56, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't assert notability in any way. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:21, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect as nn to School District 41 Burnaby in line with WP:SCHOOLS proposed policy which states, "A school article that fails to establish notability will not be deleted, if the school can be confirmed to exist, but would be appropriately merged and redirected." I fully realize the policy is a proposal but until it gets sorted out best to go with the redirects. Sting au  Buzz Me...   04:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the school district page as suggested above. (jarbarf) (talk) 08:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   --Daddy.twins (talk) 15:00, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect as nn. CRGreathouse (t | c) 15:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect as per WP:N and WP:SCHOOLS as cited by Sting au. Cite WP:SCHOOLS enough and maybe it will become de facto policy. Noroton (talk) 21:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Agreed with redirect, I've just taken care of all the remaining elem schools that hadn't been deleted and redirected them to School District 41 Burnaby. I didn't do this one because of the AfD but as nom, I'd obviously support it and consensus. Travellingcari (talk) 21:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.