Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:11, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Gilro

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable business. This article was translated from the original Israeli version, which likely had a major WP:COI. – Broccoli &#38; Coffee (Oh hai) 02:30, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:20, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:20, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:21, 15 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment. The company has had some success as an exporter, according to the references in the article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:42, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Response What has that got to do with notability? Is the reference good?  HighKing++ 15:41, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems fine. Don't know what the fuss is about. I Edited it a bit and think it should remain. It's not a conglomerate, but so what. Who says only huge businesses can have a wiki page?--Geewhiz (talk) 06:24, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete for inadequate sourcing, very limited SECONDARY on the page in this new article that seems to have been written by someone very familiar with the history of this family-run firm. My news archive search in the Latin alphabet turned up zilch.  If someone can produce better sources in any language, feel free to ask me to revisit.  But it unusual for even a smaller Israeli company - especially one  making a product as popular as sweets - to fail to get a mention in Western media outlet in a Proquest archive search.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete The references do not meet the criteria for establishing notability but like E.M.Gregory above, if references turn up, I'm happy to review my !vote. Topic fails NCORP and GNG.  HighKing++ 15:41, 20 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.