Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilroy College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep. JYolkowski // talk 23:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Gilroy College
No assertion of notability of school. Appears to be completely unspectacular. Also a frequent target of vandalism, but that's beside the point. riana_dzast a  03:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added references and categories, and I hope that the article is better now. But I'm really not very interested in Catholic secondary schools in Australia. I only expanded the article because I saw that it was up for deletion. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 04:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 04:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)(UTC)
 * Keep All schools are inherently notable -- Librarianofages 06:18, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Colleges and secondary schools are generally considered to be notable, and the same would apply here.  Yamaguchi先生 08:35, 24 October 2006
 * My first dodgy AfD nom! Had to be one sometime :) Fair enough, then. riana_dzast a  10:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, and considering the nominator identifies that they made a genuine mistake, speedy close - no other viewpoint other than keeps have been given. Daniel.Bryant 10:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * *sob* That works for me. riana_dzast a  22:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.