Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gin-Sung


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. I might be going out on a limb here, but I'm going to delete this one. No reliable sources means it can't be verified (per WP:V). ---J.S (T/C) 04:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Gin-Sung


Speedy deletion as probable hoax was overturned at WP:DRV and is now thrown out to the hoax sleuths at AfD. No opinion from me. trialsanderrors 18:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Only source listed is non-working page from Occultopedia. Doesn't look good. More: These few pages are all that google finds. This is the Occultopedia page, which identifies this with the Dzu-Teh, which in turn identifies it with the Yeti.If kept, merge into Yeti as Heuvelman's darkfurred variant; deletion acceptable.     Septentrionalis 19:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Probably hoax. Gnusmas 20:17, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:14, 7 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak keep I don't know the reliability of occultopedia.com (if it's got pedia in it, we must accept!). The link in the article had a bad link, here is the valid link (I've fixed it in the article as well): . But it does sound like something made up to scare kids, or of the sorts. -- MECU ≈ talk 16:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of WP:RS. Leibniz 17:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.