Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Austin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirect. Johnleemk | Talk 15:53, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Gina Austin
Unremarkable adult model. Article contains nothing more than the fact that she was on the cover of an issue of Penthouse magazine in September 2005. According to Freeones, she has a handful of free online galleries, but in my personal opinion that means nothing in todays pornography industry. Saberwyn 02:18, 5 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Redirect or merge into Penthouse cover models (2005). B.Wind 09:17, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Penthouse Pets, where she's already mentioned. - Mgm|(talk) 11:19, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not even referred to as a Pet. She's called a POM.  I'm pretty sure that she's not a Pommie, but the presence of private slang is already an indication of this being, essentially, porncruft.  She has no substantial career beyond this nudity.  Geogre 18:42, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * So you're voting delete because someone abbreviated "Pet of the Month"? - Mgm|(talk) 09:28, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No, for the reasoning above. She had no career beyond this.  However, I was making a point about "cruft":  When an item, service, artifact, or person is only known by die hard fans of a subject, then that subject does not transcend its most narrow context and is not appropriate for an encyclopedia.  (That's my definition of "cruft.")  The presence of the acronym shows that the motive and expected audience for the article is fans of particular runs of a particular magazine: cruft.  Therefore, it is not encyclopedic.  Geogre 13:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.