Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Gregory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  17:09, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Gina Gregory

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a person notable only for serving as a city councillor. Mobile AL is not a global city for the purposes of WP:POLOUTCOMES, but fact that a handful of local media hits exist is not in and of itself enough to get a city councillor over the bar, because every city councillor everywhere can always show five or six local media hits. Rather, the notability test she would have to clear is that she could be shown to be getting nationalized coverage that marks her out as significantly more notable than most other city councillors -- but that's not in evidence here at all. Bearcat (talk) 22:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:03, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:03, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:04, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:04, 6 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete as an "ordinary" city council member in a city this size.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:11, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, trivial. Not notable for stand alone article. An elected city official doing a job. Kierzek (talk) 01:55, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete While the subject was selected to serve as President of the Mobile City Council, I have not seen any nationalized coverage of the subject that would make the subject pass WP:NPOL. --Enos733 (talk) 05:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable local politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:11, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Deleteper nom, fails WP:NPOL. Hninthuzar (talk) 12:42, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. per nomination. Good nom. Failed WP:GNG. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 15:56, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. Clear fail. Britishfinance (talk) 10:54, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NPOL. Lacking enough sources currently. Lapablo (talk) 15:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.