Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Zamparelli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep per improvements and withdrawal of AfD request. Thanks to User:S. Dean Jameson for the rewrite effort. Frank |  talk  18:15, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Gina Zamparelli

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article has several problems, most notably, it appears to be spam written by the subject. Not blatant spam like you might get in e-mail, but it is self-promoting. Add to that that it has no lead section, is virtually devoid of verifiable references/citations, is not encyclopedic, it has NPOV issues and no articles link to it, this article should be deleted. Gmatsuda (talk) 23:29, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - the article may suffer from formatting problems, and perhaps some other issues, but it is a candidate for rescue, not deletion. The subject clearly has notability. I am all for deleting content that doesn't add to the encyclopedia...but this page does not fall into that category. Frank  |  talk  00:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. This person is notable, as pointed out by Frank, and the problems with the article were easily fixed in perhaps ten minutes of editing. There's still some work to be done, sure, but why delete a perfectly decent article, when we don't have to do so? — Preceding unsigned comment added by S. Dean Jameson (talk • contribs)

Article is much improved, thanks to Frank. I'll withdraw the AFd. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 03:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.