Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ginger Gonzaga (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:40, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Ginger Gonzaga
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Still having the same notability problems that it had when article failed AFD. i am not finding significant sources with more than about four sentences about her. WP:TOOSOON Nat Gertler (talk) 13:58, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't appear to be significantly more notable than she was in 2011. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:57, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 3 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  02:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment Should this have been a CSD G4, given the previous AfD, or has it been established as sufficiently different from the article deleted in 2011? It certainly can't be said to be better referenced, as it is currently an unreferenced BLP. AllyD (talk) 06:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I reckoned that the Mixology claim, being new and the closest thing to notability, separated it from the G4. But then, I also thought that the PROD would do the trick, having missed the rather odd policy that an article that has failed AFD gets more protection than one that has never faced that. Anyway, if you think it should be deleted, you should probably specify that here. --Nat Gertler (talk) 06:28, 11 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  05:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:14, 29 July 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.