Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ginger Wallace (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 21:34, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Ginger Wallace
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This subject does not meet WP:ARTIST or WP:BASIC, as per several source searches. The first AfD discussion was closed as no consensus in August 2011. North America1000 07:18, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: NOT a great article but I believe it establishes at least a sufficient degree of notability. Needs work, though. I'm open to being convinced I am wrong as this is not my field of expertise. Quis separabit?  19:55, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:Artist. One exhibition (of original book illustrations) in the San Diego Art Institute is not enough to establish notability. Mduvekot (talk) 22:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:44, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: Won awards in a major metro area, article needs work, but given the era, not a lot will be google-able.  Montanabw (talk) 07:51, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I believe that Wallace was the recipient of one award, the non-notable Millennium Award, not several. Per this source it "is presented to individuals or organizations committed to the betterment of the park …". Mduvekot (talk) 10:49, 14 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep I added sources that show her to be important in several Balboa park initiatives. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:56, 16 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment from nominator – Changing my stance from delete to weak keep, per two sources (added to the article) that demonstrate WP:BASIC is met:, . Struck part of my nomination above. North America1000 08:38, 19 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.