Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gingernaps


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete as per nomination's justification - doesn't matter whether permission is given for content. - Mailer Diablo 01:32, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

Gingernaps
Refer to this old revision. Again, there's a claim of permission on the talk page, but I can't find any evidence that this company meets WP:CORP. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 14:13, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - family business started in 2005. Renata3 17:42, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Dalbury (talk) 00:29, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * delete as per nom Pete.Hurd 20:08, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. the subject of the page is not sufficiently noteworthy to satisfy the encyclopedia's article policies WP:V, WP:NOR and WP:RS. To write a good encyclopedia article without contravening WP:NOR, multiple, independent reputable publications focusing on the subject must be available. When they are not WP:V and WP:RS cannot not be satisfied, and thus an encyclopedic article cannot be written. encephalon  12:37, 17 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.