Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ginologist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (A3)  by Neutrality. Non-admin closure. MuZemike ( talk ) 01:54, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Note: It was deleted under A3, but the deleting admin intended to delete per G3 (pure vandalism). MuZemike ( talk ) 01:56, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Ginologist

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologism. Also, the "creator" of the word also created this article. Mr. Vernon (talk) 22:39, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO - unsourced neologism. Somebody's bored at work.  Graymornings (talk) 22:51, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Neo and nonsense. andy (talk) 22:56, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. What article? I see no article. This is a job for db-blank. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Just looked at the history. It is only blank because the author took the OR and COI out and now there is nothing left. Sheesh. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:06, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * He just put some content back. Someone is really bored at work. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 23:07, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete. WP:CSD.  Nonsense and misinformation. -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 23:34, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.