Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ginta Biku


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify as a reasonable compromise between straight keep and deleting. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Ginta Biku

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable singer who's participated in one event that she didn't even win (and placed towards the bottom in). The article is also poorly formatted. { [ ( jjj    1238 ) ] }   22:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete a non-notable singer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:52, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as per WP:NM, points: 1: 1 2 3 4 Point 4: 1 -- 2 and many others... (talk) 14:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Just as an update, google news returns 799 results as Ginta Biku,1 and 26 more as Gintare Kubiliute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Overthetable (talk • contribs) 14:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:24, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)


 *  Strong Keep – Easily notable; who says 800+ Google News results makes something non-notable?  J 947  05:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * , it's not the quantity of mentions but the quality of depth czar  08:35, 4 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete or move to draft space - I'm split over whether the article passes WP:MUSICBIO but I'm erring on the side of failure. However, as the article was recently created and there's a fair bit of content I think, due to its poor writing style and layout, it should be incubated in the draft space to give the creator a chance at improving it.  Failing that, it'd be a weak delete per WP:DYNAMITE.   Dr Strauss   talk  16:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Draftify and go through the WP:AFC process as there is notability but the article needs improvement as it is too promotional at present Atlantic306 (talk) 17:59, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.