Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgia Mondani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:38, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Giorgia Mondani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article smacks of a promo piece designed to promote the subject's web site. there is only 1 reliable source which is the NY times piece the others are almost exclusively blogs about watches. 1: a photo 2: tudor passion is a blog affiliated to her club 3: NY Times 4: blog where the subject talks about herself 5: article written by the subject 6: doesn't mention the subject 7: tudor passion affiliated blog see above 8: rewrite of the NY times article 9: promo for her and her father's book that starts with "My friends, Giorgia and Guido Mondani are pictured below and they are from Italy. The Mondani's publish the most beautiful Rolex books in the world" 10: blog about watches containing a review of her and her father's book 11: a blog which starts with "I’d like to personally thank Guido and Giorgia Mondani for compiling it and for the honour of personally giving me a copy." Domdeparis (talk) 16:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Wikipedia is not meant to be a website for personal promotion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not for personal promotion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fa (talk • contribs) 08:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep well, if we have NY Times article about this, this is more then relevant then. And also, other sources looks ok, some are not, but some are. I dont think this is for deletion. --Axiomus (talk) 12:56, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Spammy / promotional. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 05:37, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NAUTHOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.