Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgia Simonato


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Will userfy on request v/r - TP 21:47, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Giorgia Simonato

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is about a women's footballer that hasn't represented the national team, which means it fails WP:NFOOTY. There are some members of the women's football task force who believe that representing their country at youth international level or appearing in the UEFA Women's Champions League also confer notability, but this individual has not done any of those. The most important, however, is that the subject hasn't received significant coverage in reliable sources, which means it fails WP:GNG. Mentoz86 (talk) 11:18, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Mentoz86 (talk) 11:20, 8 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:40, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:47, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:47, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:47, 8 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - She has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:29, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Userfy - Unless article can be expanded with references to meet WP:GNG, userfy it. WP:FPL is incomplete and currently only contains two active women's professional leagues out of numerous top-tier leagues throughout the world so is pretty much irrelevant with regard to articles about women's professional footballers.Hmlarson (talk) 19:42, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - per Sputnik. FPL comment from is incorrect, this list and the consensus arising from it revolve around fully professional leagues being the required benchmark, not simply players or individual clubs being professional. Additionally whether it is incomplete or not, it reflects the current consensus. That consensus may change, but this is not the forum in which to do so. It is easy enough to resurrect stubs like this should consensus change. Fenix down (talk) 09:56, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * No, I'm afraid it's you who is incorrect. By you I mean the four or five editors who police these discussions by following about GiantSnowman parroting "fail NFOOTBALL, fail GNG". If this article fails GNG, which I think it might, it should be deleted on that basis. The disingenuous nonsense you guys have created at WP:FPL is totally irrelevant to female players, thankfully. Clavdia chauchat (talk) 16:41, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * There is absolutely nothing incorrect about my statement. See WP:FPL to verify. For a list of top-tier women's leagues around the globe, see the main league competitions column here: Women's association football around the world. Hmlarson (talk) 18:18, 10 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:NSPORTS having not appeared in a fully professional league or represented her country in a senior international match. No evidence available that she has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources - therefore fails WP:GNG. Hack (talk) 06:49, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete – insufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. C 679 10:43, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.