Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgos Georgiou (Cypriot politician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 4meter4 (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Giorgos Georgiou (Cypriot politician)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article subject requests deletion. OTRS Ticket 2021091510008864. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. One sentence stub. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 20:56, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable, both as an MEP and as a former Cyprus MP. This article should be expanded with text translated from the corresponding article in Greek, which is significantly longer and has several references. I copied the Greek references to the English article. Did the article subject say why he would like the article deleted? He may have been referring to the Greek-language article, since there's nothing to object to in the English one. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)


 * He specifically referred to the English Wikipedia article in his request that it be deleted. No mention of an article on Greek Wikipedia. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 21:56, 15 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clear passage of WP:NPOL. - Tristan Surtel (talk) 21:31, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep – passes WP:NPOL as a national-level legislator, and there are no BLP concerns present that could justify deleting an article on such a notable public figure. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:46, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, clearly notable, and there can’t be anything in the current stub the subject objects to. Mccapra (talk) 23:02, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Snow keep: Obviously passes WP:NPOL. Curbon7 (talk) 01:51, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per comments above.Kamran Ali El-Batli (talk) 17:45, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:NPOL.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:15, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Elected officials at a national (or state/provincial) level are well-known public figures. This is contrary to the policy expressed in WP:BIODELETE. --Enos733 (talk) 22:39, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Definitely meets WP:NPOL, although it could certainly use some expansion. - Pax  Verbum  05:10, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'll grant that there was a silly titch of vandalism here that went uncaught for a couple of weeks until being reverted about half an hour before this discussion was initiated, and that was most likely the root of the subject's concern since the article otherwise contains nothing else that he could possibly object to. But that's not a reason for outright deletion per se — it just required reverting the vandalism and maybe a few more watchlisters to keep an eye on it in the future. Bearcat (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.