Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giovan Battista Verle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 22:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Giovan Battista Verle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Failed to find any reliable reference that states the notability of the subject or his imp. in the field. Winged Blades Godric 13:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep I have no trouble finding an English language source – Simulation in Healthcare Education – and there seems to be plenty more in the Italian language. The topic should be kept for improvement per our editing policy. Andrew D. (talk) 13:36, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment---Err... I am not saying that this person is non-existent.I am just saying he is non-notable.In case you got me wrong, as it seems from the above argument. Winged Blades Godric 13:44, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The American Journal of Ophthalmology described him as a "famous ivory turner ... and anatomist of the human eye". Notice the word "famous".  Q.E.D. Andrew D. (talk) 13:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep despite the misrepresentation of Andrew's rationale above, it is quite clear that Andrew was arguing for the notability of the subject. It would appear that the American Journal of Ophthalmology would also !vote keep, if it had an account. Lepricavark (talk) 16:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I am having troubles finding the AJO link.Can any of you please provide the link?Thanks! Winged Blades Godric 16:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - the full AJO ref is: Messenger, Harry K. "Giovanni battista verle, venetian: famous ivory turner in the service of Cosimo III grand duke of Tuscany, and anatomist of the human eye." American Journal of Ophthalmology 25, no. 7 (1942), according to google scholar. I can't go over to the library right now, but that is pretty convincing. Smmurphy(Talk) 21:06, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:41, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:41, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:41, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:41, 3 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - as my nomination. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   16:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.