Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giovanni Barra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:04, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Giovanni Barra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

References consist of WP:TRIVIAL mentions or are press releases, which are not independent of the subject. Article requires multiple independent reliable sources which cover the subject in a non-trivial manner. Until this requirements has been met, I recommend deletion of this article. KDS 4444 Talk  16:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  20:38, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  20:38, 8 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as is this is clearly applicable for deletion, with the company only being a newly founded one so he being a CEO of that is not convincing enough for any applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  06:00, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Updated and corrected both WP:TRIVIAL mentions and added some independent reliable sources (though in Italian). Fede72no Fede72no 12:43, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment as an independent editor, it seems like the sources in the article at least demonstrate some notability in the (Italian) business world. However, the article requires an obvious rewrite/cleanup, considering the article contains quotes in format that obviously gives undue weight to them/their subject. I think the article should be kept if some more viewpoints on the subject can be found and the tone can be changed to be less promotional-sounding. R. A. S immons Talk 14:38, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Cleaned sentence with possible promotional-sounding tone. Added another reference. Fede72no Fede72no 17:18, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I have had a look over the article to see what has changed since I nominated it for deletion. So far, what I see has not convinced me of this person's real-world notability: an article which, for example, contains a list of "corporate assignments" sounds like— and is, mostly— a résumé.  Which is not what Wikipedia is about.  It is not only a matter of tone (which continues to be a problem), it is a matter of content— this article still doesn't look like it has enough of the latter to qualify the subject as notable.  KDS 4444  Talk  13:40, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:12, 19 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Former assignements deleted since not significant for article's context. Fede72no Fede72no 17:35, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:18, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete run-of-the mill Italian businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:04, 31 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.