Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giraldo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete. — Phil Welch 04:56, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Giraldo
In my opinion non-notable bio and so speedy delete-able, but added AfD just in case. --Nlu 07:35, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. None of his books on any of the ususal sites (Amazon etc.). That's a good yardstick for "authors" I think. Slight overkill tagging the page perhaps :) --Alicejenny 08:25, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Ben Aveling 08:50, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: In the future, I suggest that you wait for the speedy tag to be removed before nominating an article on AfD, as it wastes time if it is speedily deleted. -- Kjkolb 09:20, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and speedy if possible. Did it really need two speedy tags and an AfD?  What's the guy done to you, Nlu? Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 10:42, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * (Response to both Kjkolb and Just zis Guy, you know?) Having both is in fact trying to speed things up -- since I really think it should be speedily deleted, but if not, then getting the AfD to move along is a good thing.  --Nlu 22:32, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * The more pressing concern on AfD is the number of articles nominated, not the speed at which they are deleted. -- Kjkolb 00:20, 10 November 2005 (UTC)


 * I took one look at this article and found that more than half of this page is devoted to templates. As a possible nn-bio and as a very short article, it has two speedy tags, then it has the tag for this AfD, and it is ALSO tagged for cleanup!  You have to scroll down to see the actual words of the article!  That means this is a bio of a non-notable person (CSD A7) with little-to-no context (CSD A1).  Speedy delete, this meets two of the criteria.  Wcquidditch | Talk 11:53, 9 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.