Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girideepam Bethany School (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 03:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Girideepam Bethany School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There's nothing sourcing wise to justify this being notable. This article has sat for 12 years with no sources at all, which is a very clear violation of our verifiability rules. A quick google search turned up no reliable sources at all. JaiMahadev (talk) 03:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The nominator is blocked/banned. ~  Ase1este charge-paritytime 12:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 27.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 03:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Since the school is clearly not notable and therefore fails WP:NORG. There doesn't even seem to be the usual trivial news story sources that a lot of schools have. Not that it would matter if did. Since their has to be more then passing mentions. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Hulatam (talk) 09:09, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 19:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.