Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girish Puliyoor (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nakon 03:24, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Girish Puliyoor
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There are no reliable sources to sustain article. The two sources used in the previous AfD [//www.newindianexpress.com/cities/thiruvananthapuram/article473712.ece],[//ibnlive.in.com/news/carrying-forward-the-legacy/153745-60-67.html] are virtually identicall and therefore not independant of each other and are likely PR pieces so not independant of the subject. They also spend more time talking about his medicated hair oil than his poetry. I can not find any indication that they would support notability per WP:ARTIST or WP:ENT. I can find no information on the awards claimed. In most cases a search on the award brings his WP entry up as first result. Notability can be niether estabilshed nor verified. All references in article are to blogs, Youtube or retail sites. JBH (talk) 06:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. JBH (talk) 06:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. JBH (talk)  06:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. JBH (talk) 06:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 07:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete - tagged for many months for BLP violations. He's a poet, but it appears, not a notable one. Bearian (talk) 21:19, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 17:10, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.