Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girl

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Normally I wouldn't close a discussion I voted in, but there is an overwhelming consensus here. android 79  03:46, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

Girl
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Any non-dictionary content should be merged into Gender role. Bcrowell 04:07, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep --Barista | a/k/a マイケル | T/C 04:08, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is more than a dicdef and it has been expanded to show characteristics of girls and how they compare against boys. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 04:09, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * But that's what the Gender role article is about.--Bcrowell 04:10, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Have you heard about article forking? Maybe the above article is too large to merge the information about Boys and Girls and their gender roles. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 04:16, 20 August 2005 (UTC)


 * keep -- Mr . Dude †@&pound;К ║  Çøת†яĭβü†ĬŎИ 04:12, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep should be delete boy, man, and woman? Howabout1 Talk to me! 04:19, August 20, 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep Wyss 04:28, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, an astounding nomination. Christopher Parham (talk) 04:39, 2005 August 20 (UTC)
 * Keep05:23, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - you gotta be kidding me. 23skidoo 05:27, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. -- DS1953 06:13, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Wha...? If you wanted it merged, you didn't need to bring it here, although I'm glad you did, as it would be a rather unwise merge, especially if Boy, Man, and Woman were to be merged as well. Gender role is a very large article. Keep. android  79  06:17, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * keep. Was VfDing a joke? --Irpen 06:39, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. A clear case for a speedy keep. Capitalistroadster 06:40, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - can someone take the vfd notice off the page now? --Clawed 08:10, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, the present contents indicate potentials for further expansion. --Bhadani 13:39, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks legit to me. --Dysepsion 17:09, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. More than just a dict-def. --*drew 13:40, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep--This page could use some work, and some parts of it should probbibly be mearged into gender role, but there is definitly justification for having an artical on girl.--1 black hand 21:48, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Alus 08:12, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Note that it is proposed for improvement on Collaboration of the week --Janke | Talk 19:26, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not sure I understand why you suggested this. Sarge Baldy 19:55, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, not because this vote is needed, but because I would also like to reiterate that this article is now on the important WP:COTW page. Phoenix2 05:24, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Enough "keeps", right? I removed the VfD tag. Was it too early? --Janke | Talk 06:54, 25 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.