Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girl Next Door (anime)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. This seems to be going the way of WP:SNOW keep due to existing sources that were missed by the nominator. As I would !vote keep as well, might as well close this to avoid unnecessary bureaucracy. (non-admin closure) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Girl Next Door (anime)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unsourced. Search results for both the anime and eroge show a bunch of anime with similar names but not exactly this one, except for Anime News Network's encyclopedia. Fails notability. Neocorelight (Talk) 10:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Anime and manga. Neocorelight (Talk) 10:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Delete  I searched for: "Girl Next Door" "anime" -demon and didn't find anything. Searching for "Girl Next Door" "eroge" showed nothing either.   D r e a m Focus  12:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - Nominator didn't bother to look at the talk page where you can see a bunch of reviews listed, all reliable sources per WP:A&M/ORS. 2 reviews by Mania.com (former AnimeOnDVD):, , review by THEM Anime Reviews, review by Animefringe, paragraph in an article by ANN. ANN is not SIGCOV but the other sites' coverage is enough to meet WP:GNG. --Mika1h (talk) 12:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I didn't, sorry, because there's no hint at all that there's something in the talk page. Neocorelight (Talk) 13:11, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * WP:BEFORE says to check the talk page before nominating. Also when you're editing the article and the talk page has a "refideas" template, at the top of the page there's a note that reads: "There are suggestions on this article's talk page for references that may be useful when improving this article in the future." --Mika1h (talk) 13:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Also might note that although the Hentai Jump is an unreliable source, the review is by Mike Toole, who later wrote for Anime News Network: . --Mika1h (talk) 13:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep; based on the sources provided by Mika1h, this clearly meets WP:GNG since at least the Mania and THEM sources are reliable and significant coverage. Link20XX (talk) 14:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Reliable sources found giving it significant coverage.  D r e a m Focus  14:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.