Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girl Number One (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jane Holland. North America1000 00:50, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Girl Number One (book)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to meet either WP:GNG or WP:Notability (books). The Cornish Guardian article already cited is the only article I can find on Google News, I can't find any reviews of the book published in reliable sources by googling, and the book does not appear to have won any major awards, have had any other notable works based off of it, or be by a historically significant author. In fact, the author herself appears to be barely notable. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 14:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:21, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Jane Holland. Other than the mention in the Cornish Guardian, there's no coverage. Wikipedia doesn't count Amazon rankings as a sign of notability on Wikipedia for several reasons, to the point where it's specifically mentioned as an example of what bestseller lists do not count towards notability. However because the author has an article, I see no reason why it can't redirect there (unless it gets deleted as well). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect perhaps as the few sources are amusing but simply not enough for solid independent notability to an article. SwisterTwister   talk  05:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  21:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * redirect CerealKillerYum (talk) 03:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the author's page. I couldn't find any coverage other than this. This wouldn't satisfy WP:NBOOK. Redirecting is a much better option and considering the article's current length, this information can be easily merged to the author's page. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.