Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girl Scout cookies in popular culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:02, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Girl Scout cookies in popular culture

 * – ( View AfD View log )

If this was a section in the Girl Scouts article, it would be deleted. Every single last reference is entirely trivial and barely relevant to the topic. D O N D E groovily  Talk to me  04:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with nominator. Original synthesis list nonsense. "In popular culture" is not a euphemism for "trivial occurrences." Wickedjacob (talk) 04:50, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Put that cookie down! Now! (Delete). Unsourced, one-off mentions that mean nothing. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 05:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, another non-notable list of trivial one-off mentions, of which hardly any are sourced. J I P  &#124; Talk 07:25, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge to Scouting in popular culture, which could also use a trimming but is in much better shape, per original merge tag--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Since I'm probably the one who will merge it, please read thru the list and let me know which references are worth keeping. D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  18:12, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect/Merge to Scouting in popular culture. Some of the things on this list already exist there. Blake (Talk·Edits) 15:27, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, then delete that article. See my above argument. Wickedjacob (talk) 08:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Poorly sourced trivia which would appear to fail just about every relevant guideline. No need for a merge since most of the sourced content is already in the other article, and the title isn't a very plausible search term. Alzarian16 (talk) 19:06, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge to Scouting in popular culture Not good enough to be it's own article Breawycker (talk) 13:04, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.