Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girl Scouts of Jamaica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 00:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Girl Scouts of Jamaica

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not meet the criterias of Notability (organizations and companies). Newly founded organization with a very small membership according to its website. Was speedied twice. --jergen (talk) 13:29, 28 October 2008 (UTC) jergen (talk) 13:29, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * keep as this article was written by a different editor, obviously there is some interest in this article remaining. In addition, one of the speedies was for being written like an advert, which this version is not, so the fact that it was speedied twice is somewhat beside the point. At the very least, if not kept, this should be merged with Scouting in Jamaica. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 13:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to become a section within Scouting in Jamaica until more information becomes available. DiverScout (talk) 20:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per DiverScout. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  20:18, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge notable but needs expanded.  — Rlevse • Talk  • 20:40, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and expand. --—— Gadget850 (Ed)  talk  -  22:38, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect into Scouting in Jamaica until there is enough information to write a separate article. - Mgm|(talk) 22:53, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Expand this to an article. There is much information about this Association on their website. Chris could assist them in putting together the entry.--Nickmini (talk) 02:29, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This organization has only just started this month. There is a mention of the 2nd Troop, so there may be two troops, but we do not really know. It is small. It may be just one troop. It is not noticed by people outside this organisation, so it is not notable enough for a separate article. It seems to be much smaller than the Girl Guides of Jamaica and probably is a break-away group from that long-established organization. Merging it into Scouting in Jamaica is the only real option at this time. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  03:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Scouting in Jamaica is not an article. It is a list.--Nickmini (talk) 04:55, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Scouting in Jamaica is like similar articles for almost all countries that have Scouting. They can include anything that does not fit into a specific article on one organization. Scouting in the United States for example is quite long. Scouting in the United Kingdom is more like a list, but contains other material. Look at some of them. They were all created last year after a discussion at the Scouting WikiProject. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  05:07, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Scouting in Jamaica currently reads only as a list. there is no article, not even a stub.--Girlscoutsjm (talk) 08:52, 31 October 2008 (UTC) Keep ignore my bias ;-)--Girlscoutsjm (talk) 09:48, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep yeah, new organization... big deal, the way it fits into the national picture... and the world picture... definitely warrants keeping. HECK I'd say it's notable because it's "girl scouts" but such a new national organization!--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:51, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep national level Scouts clubs are notable.  Dloh  cierekim  01:02, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep as content has now developed beyond stub standard, and content seems good quality and notable within the size of the community. Merging with Scouting in Jamaica may be an option, but due to the stub nature of that page, it would end up effectively becoming an article on this Association. DiverScout (talk) 22:19, 1 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.