Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girl Talk (Album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Girl Talk (Album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about an unreleased musical recording, lacks notability per WP:NALBUMS. The only actual reference is from a commercial web site where one can purchase the upcoming album. - MrX 01:47, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. The release date is only about six weeks away, and the album will surely chart and receive plenty of significant coverage by then. For now, though, coverage in reliable sources seems limited to "New album coming. Mission statement is 'what it's like to be a woman'. Listen to the single below." I don't think that's really enough to warrant an individual article just yet, though I wouldn't mind a redirect if consensus goes that way.  Gong   show  04:19, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or Incubate. As it is released in little over 6 weeks time, common sense should tell us that there will be plenty of coverage soon with details of the tracklisting, etc. While details are slightly thin on the ground at the moment, it has received quite wide coverage, e.g., , , , , , , and then there's always this for background on the album's recording. --Michig (talk) 19:17, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 09:50, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:06, 23 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Incubate - Nothing anyone on this page said is criteria for deletion. This is especially true since its obvious this album will be notable and will just be recreated in less than two months.  This album should or either stay up or more ideally be incubated until it comes out. Hope that clears everything up. Mrmoustache14 (talk) 23:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep (changed from above). After further consideration, there's actually enough material in reliable sources to put together a reasonably detailed stub (ie, info from article's sources can be incorporated into a couple paragraphs of text), and the release date is imminent, so deletion does not seem like the ideal solution.  Gong   show  20:07, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.