Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girls Sport Victoria (GSV) subpages


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was DELETE. -Docg 22:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Girls Sport Victoria (GSV) subpages
(View AfD) (View log) Non-notable contest between several schools, additional content entirely within Girls Sport Victoria (GSV). Orderinchaos 04:57, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Orderinchaos 05:00, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and/or redirect any relevant, important, and independantly sourced information to the parent article. Not-a-keep. -- saberwyn 11:17, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete And now on the seventh day of our lord in this the year 2007, Orderinchaos spoke amongst the people, the regular watches of the Aust. Del. Sort page. And he did speak thus, reminding us of his encounters with Public Schools Association editors and the trail of wikideath and destruction left behind by the unwashed masses. And verily he did command the multitide to speak up, and rid the wiki of this scourge, citing a lack of compliance with the manual of style, notability, and other wiki policies and guidelines. And thus as a member of the people I voted strong delete, to assist in ridding these wikilands of such problems. Thewinchester (talk) 12:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment We now refer to these kind of editorial problems as Aquinascruft. Thewinchester (talk) 12:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Rather then delete, what about letting me just combine the whole lot into one page like many of the other Australian schools sports association pages we have already set up? Deletion is very harsh. User:Steve Stefan 9:50, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Are the details of who won a school swimming carnival actually encyclopaedic, though? Orderinchaos 01:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment I think its very important knowing who won major sporting carnivals over time. This is especially important to independent schools in Australia and is typical of what is recorded for all other School Sporting Associations on Wikipedia. User:Steve Stefan
 * Merge as per Steve Stefan providing that there are reliable sources. Google News Archives indicates that there may be some. Capitalistroadster 05:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No notability shown yet. Certainly not the top end of amateur competition. However, some of them shouldn't be too hard to make into a notable list with all the newspaper references to the various competitions. Assize 10:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, what Thewinchester said above so eloquently. Results from a collection amateur sports carnivals, and not even top-line amateur carnivals at that.  Lankiveil 12:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete high school sports, arent notable. Another flawless display of what constitutes a WP:NOT indiscriminate collection of information. Gnangarra 09:34, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete These are all orphan pages, not even the parent article links to them. But really, the sports association should have its own web-page with the results, we should have one article on Girls Sport Victoria (GSV), not host all their tournament results. --Merzul 17:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.