Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girls Will Be


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 10:53, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Girls Will Be

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not seems to be notable and significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Fails WP:NCOMPANY. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 15:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 15:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 15:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:13, 8 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Logs:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:22, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, it has been covered in national magazines (Parents, Good Housekeeping), on a national news channel (CNN), as well as other outlets. It seems to have extensive coverage to me. --  Zanimum (talk) 15:30, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 02:05, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a single one of the references in the article meet the criteria for establishing notability. For example, the references noted by Zanimum above are obviously based on the exact same information which must have been provided by the company or a connected source since they include the same paragraph structure and quotations. None of the references can be describted as significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content. Topic fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 15:44, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The CNN article is a paid placement. It fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND specifically. The "Parents" is an affiliate article, which means its advertising.  scope_creep Talk  10:25, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.