Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gisela Gamper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 03:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Gisela Gamper

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No real evidence of notability and no decent references. Rathfelder (talk) 00:15, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 00:15, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:53, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:53, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:53, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Strong Delete: As per. It really is amazing if we consider the fact that articles like these are getting nominated for deletion within 2 months from their creation despite that they are well sourced with more than 40 citations, all from reliable sources like New York Times, Rolling Stone etc. Regards Pesticide1110 (talk) 09:52, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete It's amazing this article has survived 13 years without good sourcing. I could not find anything beyond namechecks in Google Books, mostly for photography credits.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:09, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Does not pass GNG nor NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 19:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.