Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gittemeier House


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:20, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Gittemeier House

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:NBUILD. Not on any national historic register. Sources are not independent, except one local newspaper article. Not enough in-depth independent coverage for WP:GNG. MB 05:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Missouri. MB 05:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: I've, particularly using a few more articles from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch via Newspapers.com. Bsoyka  ( talk ) 16:35, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. I did not look at previous version, but the article currently is fine. The historic significance of building is proven by expense incurred in saving it.  The local historical society which owns/uses the historic building, Historic Florissant (was a redlink, becoming a redirect), can be covered in the same article as done for many similar pairs (and/or the article could be moved in the to the organization name, with a section on its headquarters building).  And it is no longer an orphan article. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 21:47, 28 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.