Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giulia Sarkozy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete and redirect to Nicolas Sarkozy. Also neatly covering both parents! The Bushranger One ping only 06:33, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Giulia Sarkozy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Daughter of French President Nicolas Sarkozy. She was just born on October 18, 2011. Nobility is not inherited. Being just born, she probably hasn't done anything notable (insert baby jokes here). Bgwhite (talk) 05:52, 21 October 2011 (UTC) Speedy Delete - clearly the baby deserves a mention on her dad's page but not an article to herself - she hasn't [| created any works] of her own, (Laurence Sterne). Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:39, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete See, this is amusing. The examples section of WP:NOTINHERITED has all these non-literal usages of the word "inherited," and here we have someone whose only claim to notability is literally that she inherited it. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  06:08, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per nom, see WP:NOTINHERITED--Cavarrone (talk) 07:47, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Clear Delete. Most likely she will be back in WP some day, but definitely now there is no inherited notability. --Nepenthes (talk) 13:29, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Clear Merge and redirect to papa (and, therefore, don't delete). --Lambiam 14:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Why not to mother? Are we patriarchic? :P --Nepenthes (talk) 15:34, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * As in "Sarkozy, Sarkozy, ... wait a second, isn't that the husband of Carla Bruni?". 77.250.167.51 (talk) 19:59, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 21 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Notability is not inherited. Infant children of important politicians often get press coverage, but it is adequate to mention them in their parent's article until they are old enough to be doing noteworthy things on their own. Edison (talk) 17:10, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ginsengbomb. After deletion, allow a redirect to one of her parents' articles, but just being the child of a famous person does not usually warrant a separate article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * If you want this page to become a redirect page to Nicolas Sarkozy, you should not recommend to delete it. --Lambiam 21:40, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Why not? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep & redirect Mythic Writerlord (talk) 15:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep & redirect to Nicolas Sarkozy seems like the most sensible thing to do. 142.207.112.179 (talk) 22:12, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect. At Nicolas Sarkozy, I just added (well, copypasted) the bit about Giulia being the first child born to a serving French president, which completes the merge. There is nothing here that isn't there, so redirect per Bgwhite.  City O f Silver  22:23, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep the immediate family of heads of state are notable, in exactly the GNG sense: a good deal is written about them. I support the idea of abandoning the GNG in favor of some standard for "doing notable things". in cases where we can actually define "notable things" In some fields we do: books, academics, recordings, athletes. For general interest by the general public I thing the GNG has a necessary place--otherwise we are judging on the basis of what ought to be important, which is a version of ILIKEIT.    DGG ( talk ) 03:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.