Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giuliano Mignini (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Giuliano Mignini
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reasons for him to be notable. Only a district attorney involved in Meredith Kercher murder. -- Lenore (talk) 17:33, 2 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Previous AfD: Articles for deletion/Giuliano Mignini

Keep part of notable trial. Greatpumkin (talk) 18:00, 2 February 2014 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  20:56, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep as his article indicates multiple notable cases including the Narducci homicide and the Bulgari case. The article is well-referenced at 50 citations.


 * Keep Mignini meets notability criteria as he was involved in both the Monster of Florence case as well the Meredith Kercher murder investigation. The fact that he was involved in allegations of scandal and misconduct in both cases is another reason to keeping the article. The article as mentioned earlier is well sourced and is not reliant on one source although it could do with a cleaning up to meet style requirements. --smrgeog (talk) 01:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:59, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - plainly notable, as shown by the sources. Even if we entirely discount the Kercher case, he is arguably still notable for his roles in other cases: this is not a case of WP:BLP1E. Nothing significant has changed since the last AFD ended in a decisive 'keep'. Robofish (talk) 22:35, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satisfies GNG. Notable for more than one event. James500 (talk) 20:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.