Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giuseppe Prinzi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, there is a confusion indeed between two scupltors--Ymblanter (talk) 07:29, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Giuseppe Prinzi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD, non notable artist who fails WP:BIO. All references I could find, either were not independent, or did not provide significant coverage. Winner 42 Talk to me!  21:24, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: Several of his sculptures have been purchased by a government and put on public display, in parks. Ross-c (talk) 22:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * There are two people w. same name: this one & de:Giuseppe Prinzi, a sculptor of XIX century. Perhaps there is a confusion between the first and the second one. --Carlo Morino aka zi' Carlo 17:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Giuseppe Prinzi.link this http://www.archivioceramica.com/CERAMISTI/P/Prinzi%20Giuseppe.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.1.164.150 (talk) 08:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete Notability not established (and subject of a cospicuous crosswiki-SPA promotional activity)--Shivanarayana (talk) 15:10, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:08, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG, some public displays do not meet WP:ARTIST. "Significant" work should show in at least some notable news coverage and attention from critics, or a more-widespread activity in well-known exhibitions. I also agree with Shivanarayana's concerns about the article creation (WP:SOCK). GermanJoe (talk) 10:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.