Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giuseppe Prinzi (ceramist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And salt.  Sandstein  20:33, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Giuseppe Prinzi (ceramist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a re-titling (to get around salting) of an article called Giuseppe Prinzi, which was twice previously deleted; see Articles for deletion/Giuseppe Prinzi and Articles for deletion/Giuseppe Prinzi (2nd nomination). It was then salted for reasons given in the 2nd nomination. I am not tagging this one for G4 because the current article is somewhat different from the two deleted ones. For those who can't see the previous articles, please evaluate this article on its own, to decide of the person meetsWP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. I believe he does not - and if the result is delete, I would recommend salting this title as well. MelanieN (talk) 02:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, the sources do not provide notability, and the difference with the version I deleted is not significant.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment Not to be confused with Giuseppe Prinzi (sculptor) (1825-1895). This earlier sculptor has an article in Italian Wikipedia, while the "... (ceramicist)" does not. Pam  D  09:43, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Another attempt at an article, Prinzi_(artist), was deleted in August of 2015. LaMona (talk) 15:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, LaMona. That was actually just a redirect to one of the earlier articles, but I have now salted that title as well. --MelanieN (talk) 19:49, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt (multiple re-creations) - per Ymblanter (can't see the deleted version as non-admin). But even without that, just looking on the current version: the included sources (blog, exhibition announcement, artist profiles) don't establish notability. GermanJoe (talk) 19:03, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note - removed the section about his "artistic language". Entirely unsourced, and full of puffery and jargon. GermanJoe (talk) 19:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 4 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. I don't know why the article wasn't speedy'd. Appears to be created by a single purpose account: Special:Contributions/Roller1540.  173.48.62.104 (talk) 07:53, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, because a month ago I speedy deleted Marianna Yarovskaya, which is also a self-written agiography and has been previously deleted via AfD. Because this time the creator moved some lines here and there, my decision was overturned on DRN, and the article is still there, nobody cares. This was an overly negative experience for me. I would rather stay healthy than get several months off my life for an attempt to delete garbage from Wikipedia. Let it go through AfD; the community time will be wasted but then there will be no way it can get to DRN.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * And the reason I didn't speedy it was because it had previously been to AfD, and it didn't qualify for G4 (in my opinion, YMMV). It has a lot of history; otherwise I would probably have prodded it. I think it is a little too close to making "claims of significance" for A7. And yes, it was created by an SPA, and edited by another SPA and a couple of single purpose IPs - but that is not a criterion for speedy deletion. --MelanieN (talk) 21:49, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per the nom and the above editors. And due to the activity of the article's creator, I would also agree with Salt.  Onel 5969  TT me 19:31, 11 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.