Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GiveVaccines.org


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:31, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

GiveVaccines.org

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Speedy deletion tag removed by article creator with no attempt at comment on talk page. Non-notable organisation, can find no substantial reliable sources. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:29, 29 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:58, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per, , and . Joe Chill (talk) 20:40, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: I am not convinced that these sources demonstrate WP:Notability. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Why? Joe Chill (talk) 23:37, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The detail: 1 - One mention in passing in a blog, nothing to establish notability of website (GiveVaccones.org); 2 - appears to be written up from the press release, which is reference one in the article; 3 - One mention in passing in an article on World Pneumonia Day on some sort of netowrking site. A thorough reading of WP:Notability will show you why this is nowhere near sufficient, specifically I would mention "significant coverage" and "temporary news coverage". Jezhotwells (talk) 09:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - speedy being removed by the article creator has nothing to do with AFD. In fact, the full history is that the article creator removed the speedy that I added, and they were duly warned.   Then an admin did some work to improve the article and I removed my db-spam speedy because it was no longer spam.  Then that same admin added an A7, but after I added a few (albeit weak) references the admin removed the speedy tag.  Notability is questionable at best, I agree, but this discussion should not even consider the speedy history.  Weak GNEWS hits but 6000+ ghits.    7  01:20, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Google hits have nothing to do with establishing notability. In fact Google News archive search shows 5 hits, two of which have nothing to do with GiveVaccines.org. Jezhotwells (talk) 09:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Lacks substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources, so not notable. Reprints of press releases aren't independent coverage. A mention in the GAVI Alliance article might be appropriate. Fences  &amp;  Windows  22:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.