Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Give My Regards To Broadway (Disney Channel Movie)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-29 05:08Z 

Give My Regards To Broadway (Disney Channel Movie)


Keeps being recreated with unsourced information about a DCOM. Has been deleted numerous times, I think it should be deleted and protected from being recreated. I have it currently Redirecting to Give My Regards to Broadway. Even IMDB doesn't have a list for Give My Regards To Broadway. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 01:16, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. Big  top  02:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TSO1D 02:50, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 03:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect (vote changed, see below), and be bold! Just like somebody else has done. Recommend protecting the link and LARTing the vandal.  --Dennisthe2 04:37, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete R3 (redirect for implausible typo). So tagged. --Dennisthe2 05:57, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment regarding "has been deleted numerous times". The logs for this article don't show that it has ever been deleted. Am I missing something?  Neil916 (Talk) 06:50, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * These logs here. The difference between that title and the legitimate article we have is a capital T. --Dhartung | Talk 07:00, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, salt at admin's discretion as the creator seems persistent. --Dhartung | Talk 07:00, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I maintain that it was speedy-deleted in error the first time - there was a bizarre sequence of events wherein it was quickly deleted then redirected by a different user, and when I questioned the closing admin about the deletion criteria, he didn't remember having deleted it to begin with. It was all very strange.  Are we sure this doesn't exist?-- Dmz5  *Edits**Talk* 22:57, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It is rather difficult to assess the article as it is currently just a redirect page - this is similar to what happened last time.-- Dmz5 *Edits**Talk* 23:31, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I looked on IMDB and googled it and nothing came up. and the creator of the article changes the actors every day. the movie either doesn't exist or is so far from coming out it doesn't belong here either. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 00:14, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Fair enough!-- Dmz5 *Edits**Talk* 00:19, 25 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Close and Take to RFD The article is clearly unverifiable crystal-ballism, and should not exist. However, I prefer to narrowly construe the authority of AFD, and because the nomination was made after the article was made into a redirect, Redirects for Deletion properly has jurisdiction over this page.-- danntm T C 03:07, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I put it here because it keeps being changed into an article with false information. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 03:25, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I understand the need to have a decision directly on the article's (unencyclopedic) content, and I thank you for your speedy reply.-- danntm T C 18:23, 25 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.