Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Given-When-Then


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 11:58, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Given-When-Then

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. This is a neologism. It's essentially a dictionary definition. Its contents could easily be incorporated into several articles without harm. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:28, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not a dictionary. Wiktionary is. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 16:41, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 14 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep this is not new, having been used in the previous decade. There is a lot more material easily found with a simple google search to expand this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:19, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep commonly used pattern in agile development and particularly behaviour driven development. Admittedly the two references in the article at present are not the best in the world, but WP:NEO clearly does not apply as there are clearly independent reliable sources about the concept.  Better references would be,  (the entirety of chapter 6 is devoted to this concept), or . JulesH (talk) 21:15, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep&mdash;I've checked out JulesH's cites and found several more with the obvious google books search. There's enough WP:RS for the topic to be notable.  Lesser Cartographies (talk) 19:01, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.