Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gizmo Logic Studios Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-16 02:47Z 

Gizmo Logic Studios Inc.

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Deleted as A7 twice by two different admins, but contested. Discussion about whether the company met WP:CORP started on my talk page, where I was provided with these links. However, the links consist merely of directory entries, links to online stores where the companies products are being sold, and press releases. None of the links provided were non-trivial. Article was created by User:Scot Lemieux, who according to the article is one of the company's founders. WP:COI case for a non-notable computer animation studio.

Worth reading is the article's talk page, where User:Lexein gives a very detailed response to the article creator's hangon reason.-- Steel 17:11, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of verifiable notability at this time, per talk page. No reliable third-party sources...need to have them in order to back up claims of notability (which aren't even made at all in the article!). DMacks 18:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete per nom Hobbeslover talk/contribs 04:09, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The vehement opposition to the article's existence, on its talk page, confirms my intuition. YechielMan 04:28, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wow! That's the longest-winded deletion discussion I've ever seen on a talk page. But [WP:RS]], WP:V, WP:COI -- three strikes, buh-bye now. Realkyhick 05:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.