Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gizoogle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. &mdash; J I P | Talk 07:35, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Gizoogle
del. nonnotable, both in content and visibility. About 800 unique google hits. A poor score for a website. Also Original research. mikka (t) 16:29, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Abstain I saw Gizoogle about 6 months ago. I've no idea how many people have seen/used it.  Probably doesn't pass notability, but I just can't bring myself to vote delete.  If it survives it definitely needs a rewrite.--Isotope23 19:09, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Dizzizzleete The best that can happen is a small blurb in the Google article about sites that look at it satirically. Non-notable, sucka! Karmafist 22:28, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Yes, we all have websites.  Few of them are significant.  Friday (talk) 22:33, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Please check in again if you're still around in ten years. Denni &#9775; 00:57, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, and also pretty bad. Ytram99 17:35, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.