Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gizwiz Studio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Kurykh (talk) 08:50, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Gizwiz Studio

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This design studio appears to lack the non-trivial RS coverage that would reflect notability. Tagged for notability (and for being written like an advert) for over a year. Epeefleche (talk) 21:37, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. I'm a bit dubious about all the listed awards as well.  The 2009 Selected as the "best value" design service provider by Wall Street Journal is in fact not an award, and the company isn't named as per this WSJ article. -- Whpq (talk) 15:05, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.