Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gjertrud Fitje


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 00:56, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Gjertrud Fitje

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I don't see any notability. Geschichte (talk) 22:28, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Only found this - doesn't pass WP:GNG. Mentoz86 (talk) 20:22, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Sadly, we don't allow for such biographies of earnest ordinary people who have led an exemplary and by many accounts interesting life, unless their achievements have been spectacular or they have been in positions of fame or power. It really is a shame. __meco (talk) 22:38, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Weakish keep. As well as the source in the article and the one mentioned above, there is this book. There are probably other sources in Norwegian and/or Chinese. Contra Meco, we don't actually require that "their achievements have been spectacular or they have been in positions of fame or power," just that they be documented, per WP:N. However, it would help if a Norwegian contributor could look for more documentation. -- 202.124.73.241 (talk) 00:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 20:53, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep The article passes WP:N and is supported by reliable sources, such as this one. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 23:18, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.