Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glabrezu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Glabrezu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable minor D&D creature that fails WP:GNG. Almost no mentions in reliable sources and nothing significant enough to merit its own article. Wikia-level fancruft. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Monsters in Dungeons & Dragons. BD2412  T 15:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, this article fails WP:GNG as it is sourced entirely to primary sources and WP:PLOT since it is written from an entirely in-universe point of view. It is not mentioned at Monsters in Dungeons & Dragons, so that is not a good redirect target. The article contains nothing of relevance to be merged. Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Coverage of this creature in non-primary sources or gamebooks is trivial, at best, and certainly not enough to pass the WP:GNG or to sustain an independent article. The lack of coverage also means that it is not a notable enough topic to be covered at the main D&D monster article.  Rorshacma (talk) 02:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. DnDfancruft failing WP:NFICTION/NOTAGAMEGUIDE. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:30, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete; no secondary sources. Redirects are cheap, so no harm if someone wants one. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.