Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glam Gonzo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. PeaceNT (talk) 07:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Glam Gonzo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No sources to show that this genre of porn is notable in that it has received significant coverage in independent 3rd party sources per WP:N Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I didn't even know there were genres of pornography. But I seriously doubt this is notable, so delete it, or redirect to Gonzo pornography, of which this is apparently a derivative. I (talk) 02:10, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non notable, or something made up (whether the thing itself is made up, or just the word is). No need for a redirect, as there really is no mention of this in the other article. - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable without reliable sources. This article cites none. The article refers back to Gonzo pornography, where the author has also added an unsourced "glam gonzo" mention. • Gene93k (talk) 05:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. Article history shows that it is advertising (original version ). Author removed external links after call for speedy. • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. Article history shows that it is advertising (original version ). Author removed external links after call for speedy. • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - original research, most likely.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 05:50, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism and original research. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 06:27, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unreferenced possibly original research. Fails WP:V and WP:N. Seems to be advertising, along with the main article on gonzo pornography. Edison (talk) 18:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.