Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glamarus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 23:41, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Glamarus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This has been tagged for speedy deletion, but an ordinary film can't be deleted per A7 (it's a creative work). I declined the speedy tag, but neither the film nor the director is notable as far as I can tell. Bbb23 (talk) 21:02, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:13, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:13, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Virtually nothing out there -- and nothing that would confer notability. --Larry (talk) 22:48, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete with predjudice. This one smacks of COI, not only on this article but also Vomit Fist (where the article creator "suckered" the CSD tagger to remove the tag based on inherited notability).     ArcAngel    (talk) ) 00:54, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:NFF. No coverage of the unreleased film, yet.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 07:43, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Obvious one. Fails WP:NFF and maybe WP:COI. --Jersey92 (talk) 23:56, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete' per WP:CRYSTAL - it appears not to have been released yet. Bearian (talk) 20:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NFF. Vanamonde93 (talk) 13:13, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.